How do you accept and learn new information without proof? For

>>9057300
reason

>>9057300
Just put whatever is consistent with whatever they are saying on the paper.

It's not like you really have to believe it or anything.

>>9057300
Well i don't.

>>9057300
This is a bad troll maybe? There's an infinite series of statements you accept without "proof".

>>9057300
Logical deduction.

Use it to actually work problems, and it'll stick with you as a just-so step in the process. In your context, that means going to the end of relevant chapters in a relevant textbook and working them to completion. It's doubly good if answers without methods are in the back, so you can keep working the problems until you're able to match those and detail the processes used to get there.

If you want proof, you're asking to do experiments, which costs money that you probably don't have. Even the best schools aren't going to do that for most of your lessons. You can find some experimental proofs on YouTube, and professors who are passionate enough will run an experiment in class if you ask for it and can think of good, cheap, available materials to use for it.

File: 1500896686524.jpg (38KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x640px

>>9058172

>Experiments

If you want proof in a non-brainlet discipline, you can construct or derive it yourself on paper.