could Man devolve back into bacteria or any other primitive

>>9055121
Maybe

>>9055121
who said we didnt already

>>9055121
Well, sure - bears reevolved into fish (see whales) so why not?

>>9055121
just fuck a nigger and that will set your offspring a few genetic evolution's back

>>9055121
no
but if you look at life holistically you can see it devolve to states of lower complexity after anthropocentric behavior.
as a species we are currently in an evolutionary trap, and are plagued by malignant etho-ecological mismatches.
oh dad, we're all devo.

>>9055217
*anthropogenic
anthropocentric sorta works too

>>9055121
well it wouldnt be called "devolving", it's still evolution, just to more "primitive" genes or their expressions

>>9055121
we could develop into simpler creatures but not into single cell organisms

>>9055121
yea sure, you get cancer and that's just that
there is a sample of a woman's cancer cells that are used in almost every cancer lab

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks

>>9055121
>devolve
>primitive

Evolution isn't a ladder. Bacteria today are just as evolved as mammals - arguably even more so, since they see orders of magnitudes more generations and mutations than slow sexual reproduction.

You could have phrased your question as "Could humans ever evolve to be unicellular again?", to which the answer is "sort of" - for example, the HeLa line may count.

>>9055149
>bears reevolved into fish (see whales)
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you that you're completely retarded.

>>9055134
Germs
Over
People

Yes, and evidence says it is already happening