Hello friendos i got caught up in a weird discussion with strangers

>>9036343
This is true except for black "people"

>>9036374
>/pol/ falseflagging as someone falseflagging as /pol/

That's just one if things people say to feel good but nobody believes deep down. People make snap judgements of other people's intelligence levels after a couple minutes of conversation or sometimes simply from their facial features alone, and categorize their competence levels from there.

>>9036384
>implying blacks are capable problem solvers

Funny, Africa is still a shithole

I was actually just about to respond to a post in the "in an infinite time could a chimp prove a theorem" thread to ask this.
I don't have anything to add rn, I just hope this doesn't turn into a race iq thread

>>9036419
too late

This is ONLY true if you count randomly thrashing at a keyboard until, just from pure random chance and with no thought involved, they randomly happen to produce a collection of letters that form a sentence which is the correct answer.

There are some things that certain people will simply never be able to understand.

in the same vein, do you think there is an "upper bound" to what a person can learn? if there was, would that then contradict the statement in the OP

After a certain amount of time, wouldn't they get Alzheimer and other mental disorders from extreme age?

>>9036461
The brain doesn't have infinite storage space, so obviously it would run out eventually

>>9036435
This

>>9036343
>what is undecidability?

>>9036343
I would append that to enough time and information, unless you want to count solving the problem by chance.

>>9036435
ironically, neural networks "solve" problems through optimization / regression without actually understanding them, and we call them artificial "intelligence"

really makes you think

>>9036866
define "actually understanding"

>>9036870
my point exactly.

>>9036472
>The brain doesn't have infinite storage space, so obviously it would run out eventually
does it need infinite storage space though?
we can't store all numbers in our brains, yet we know all of them

>>9036343
It is true.

A guy with 5 IQ is asked the question: who are you?
He sits there and asks himself: Who am I?
He never found out.

>>9037038
Your brain doesn't store numbers; it stores standard methods to generate numbers. It's that methodical number generation, not the numbers themselves, that requires you to use your memory.