Why do you /sci/tards like modern architecture so much?

File: czech-republic-prague-dancing-house.jpg (98KB, 630x410px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 630x410px

>>9018998
More proof its gross and ugly

File: Habitat_panorama.jpg (198KB, 1920x460px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 1920x460px

>>9018999
Even more proof

>>9018998
>>9018999
Looks good desu

>>9019004
That's brutalism, not modern

>>9018998
>Why do you /sci/tards like modern architecture so much? Its beyond ugly.

At my university it's the opposite. Liberal Arts students like the modern glass houses and we prefer the brick and mortal buildings.

File: Pozsony járási SZTK rendelő.jpg (399KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1024x683px

>>9019007
Its a freakin monstrosity. Its extremely unpleasing aesthetically.

>>9018998
But I don't. I always loved it when one of my lectures was held in one of the old historical buildings the university had.

File: c-brno-unesco-tugendhat-villa-1.jpg (67KB, 575x370px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 575x370px

>>9019009
At my uni the liberal extremists of stem prefer this ugly degeneracy.

>>9019004
That is top tier brutalism and i fucking love it, saved.

Would definitely live in/10

>>9019021
Why, you autistic degenerate????

>>9018998
>>9018999
>>9019004
Got any examples of good architecture?

>>9019009
>mortal buildings
>mortal
dude, i wouldnt prefer it if the building is mortal...

anyways, maybe you should specify what kind of modern architecture you dont like, since its not all the same, I, for once, am a great fan of Gehry and deconstructionism in general (e.g. the dancing house op mentioned), while i loathe a lot of those glass houses op mentioned, that are just designed to "look modern" from unoriginal architects, trying to go with the zeitgeist.

>pic related, good architecture

File: agraffiticomealive .jpg (1MB, 2280x1514px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2280x1514px

>>9019048
forgot pic

File: whatdoesthislooklike.jpg (72KB, 650x365px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 650x365px

>>9019050
also, another great example of deconstructivism is zaha hadid. she is also trolling people on a massive scale, since she got qatar, which is one of the worlds states with the highest opression of women, to let her design the stadium for the soccer world cup, and she got away with designing it like a giant vulva.

>>9019035
Because i find it aesthetically pleasing, unlike the other buildings in this thread, you autistic retard!!!!

>>9019050
What is the purpose of this retarded nonsense? Why build something with that shape?

File: fire-guard-station-byhadid.jpg (21KB, 624x414px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 624x414px

>>9019057
another example of hadids work, pls tell me how that isnt aestethic

>>9018998
>stop liking what I don't like!
Neoclassicism has no character and is unamenable to modern building practices without faking everything.

File: travel-marques-de-riscal-m.jpg (230KB, 620x415px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 620x415px

>>9019061
this is a wine hotel, and it got designed like that, to generate strong emotions by the person that sees it; so since you seem to hate it, it fullfilled its purpose and you can consider yourself trolled by a building

File: 9425c1c1f75f02233a5c69799e645aaa.jpg (842KB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 3888x2592px

>>9019043
This, for example. Not a Nazi, but this building looks fucking great.

File: 1499269649062.jpg (50KB, 550x600px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 550x600px

>>9019068
This provokes strong emotions, too. Doesn't make it any less nonsensical and purposeless.

File: 1431337300228.jpg (675KB, 1024x681px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 1024x681px

>>9018998
This is good architecture guys.

>>9019043
>>9019090

>>9019090
>baroque
>good

>>9019090
That's just a lot of gingerbread, it's not the architecture you like.

>>9019090
You have bad taste.

>>9019070
This is hideous.

File: 180px-Chrysler_Building_by_David_Shankbone_Retouched.jpg (30KB, 180x531px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 180x531px

Reminder that art deco is god-tier.

>>9019090
this is a good example, of how a nation without any culture tries to copy architecture (victorian style of england) but fails creating something aesthetic and just takes a huge dump on it, because they didnt understand it in the first place

File: 2f5hw08gh0gnset59ghw57thq3-7hqwgwp59ghaerig.jpg (165KB, 1022x679px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1022x679px

>>9019098
>>9019097
>>9019102
>>9019104
I was obviously joking guys. Its not even made out of brick or stone lol. Look at the wall. Its made out of degeneracy.

File: 4420d4d559fc0961bda12c589285dc11--frank-lloyd-wright-homes-frank-lloyd-wright-usonian.jpg (60KB, 500x357px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 500x357px

Usonia is fucking beautiful tho. I admit that.

>>9018999
This is actually pretty tho

>>9019134
Are you high?

>>9019148
not him, but before shitting on this building, you should go to prague and look at it in person, its called the dancing house, aka fred and ginger building (and if you dont get that reference, you re a cultural brainlet) for a reason. it feels like the house is dancing indeed, but you cant really get this impression by merely looking on pictures of it. you have to see it in person, so get out of your basement, go there, look a bit on it, walk around it and then you can judge it.

Beauty is subjective and its important this to be taught otherwise populists and regressive tyrants can make use of it.

I find contemporary architecture considerably more interesting and humane than the artificial blobs and blocks symbolizing some obscure despot's megalomania and pitiful male bravado.

>>9019160
>>9019160
>>9019160
>Beauty is subjective and its important this to be taught otherwise populists and regressive tyrants can make use of it.
Funny, I thought that SJW took advantange of the word "subjective" and changed it to "You're a liar, from my point of view I'm beautiful, that makes me objectively beautiful" said the ugly goblin. Or in case of every disabled, dumb, uneducated, talentless person pretending they're something they're not.

>>9018998
Architecture doesn't belong in /sci/.

GET OUT

>>9019097
That isn't even Baroque.

It's closer to Second Empire.

>>9019107
That's funny since Victorian architecture is just another 19th century bastardized revival, of Italian gothic specifically.

>>9019173
Yes it does. Its engineering

>>9019186
This thread is just discussing worthless aesthetics, not anything about engineering.

Engineering does not deal with aesthetics. GET OUT.

>>9019106
>Reminder that art deco is god-tier.
Bioshock anyone?

File: the-new-building-of-the-reich-chancellery-1939-c45jf4.jpg (65KB, 640x457px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x457px

>>9019070
I never understood the tonal shift in the design for Germania.

Fascist architecture was supposed to be loosely roman inspired, but striped of it's ostentation and needless frivolity.

>>9019193
Engineering does tho. Marking things thinner ect. Making them more livable and not a eye sore ect.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-07_060828.jpg (142KB, 1200x1920px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1200x1920px

>>9019212
Have you read Hitler and the power of aesthetics? This is from it

>>9019214
NO. ENGINEERING IS NOT ABOUT AESTHETICS. IT IS ABOUT PERFORMANCE. REMOVE AESTHETICS!

AESTHETICS is a waste of resources.

File: grenfail.jpg (19KB, 300x180px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 300x180px

Why did leftists impose these monstrosities on the poor of London?

>>9019218
>>9019212
hitler already let those things get build, with the intention that the ruins of them (after the end of the 1000 year reich) will still impress the shit out of people, he wanted a legacy (just like frank underwood). he wanted people to be inspired and impressed, like we are today when we stand in the remains of the colloseum (or rather watch gladiator) and get a shiver on the thought of it beeing in use. you can trust me with those insights, since im studying at the same university as albert speer lol

>>9019249
Now, now. Aesthetics isn't the concern of engineering, but let's not dismiss them either.

It's all about utility maximization, and if aesthetics bring joy or tourist bux, they can be argued to have value in a given application.

>>9019253
It was the conservatives that didn't fireproof them, because that would make construction too expensive

>>9019267
AESTHETICS IS NOT ENGINEERING. AESTHETICS DISCUSSION DOES NOT BELONG IN /SCI/.

REMOVE AESTHETICS. AESTHETICS IS A WASTE OF RESOURCES!

>>9019272
>t. reeeeee

File: 1479849177281.jpg (172KB, 749x415px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 749x415px

>>9019050

File: sydney_operahouse.jpg (272KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1200x800px

I don't understand why Normies dislike Most Modern Buildings EXCEPT few building like the Sydney Opera House.

I don't understand Why Normies Love & Like so much the Sydney Opera House, a prime example of Modern Architecture.

Why Normies hates every other Modern Building EXCEPT the Sydney Opera House.

What Sydney Opera House has that make Normies love it.

What other Modern Buildings lacks that make them uglier when compared to the Sydney Opera House ?
>>9018998 >>9018999 >>9019004 >>9019017 >>9019020 >>9019050 >>9019057 >>9019063 >>9019068 >>9019070 >>9019090 >>9019106

>>9019740
I think Sydney Opera House may not look so jarring because it's isolated from other buildings.

>>9018998
This. Today OP wasn't a faggot

>>9019057
looks nice honestly, like a metallic plant, very organic. stop projecting your fantasies onto it. I guess this counts as deconstructionism? I don't really like the usual stuff, though I do like brutalism.

>>9019148
I live in Prague and i love this building. Other modern shit is gay and retarded but this one is really nice.

File: futurist city.jpg (145KB, 500x608px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x608px

I like how there's only one or two people pushing Art Deco right now. I'm personally torn between Deco and Federalism as my favorite form of architecture.

DISCUSSION OF AESTHETICS DOES NOT BELONG ON /sci/!

Aesthetics discussion belongs on the humanities board
>>/hm/