Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: nanobot-neurons-o.gif (1MB, 320x180px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 320x180px
Nanobots replacing brain cell one after another. Bots also have external interface, giving out the current state or allowing to change the state from external source. What if you succesfully replace all 10bn of neurons with this kind of nanobot (or even about 10% but evenly distributed across the brain and somehow connected).
Now with all the extracted information about state of every bot in given moment you rebuild that structure in lab (providing friendly environment, similar to what you have inside your neurocranium), you can alter the state of every nanobot.
Could it be example of working, programmable strong AI? Maybe even conscious?
>>
>>8980327
You are forgetting one important thing, which is going to fuck all neural network fags in the ass.
Brain is not rigid and its structure changes on per second basis.
>>
>nanobots
>>
>>8980339
Why shouldn't nanobots be able to artificially rewire their synapses and reorganize its structure? It has been proposed at the beginning of oldschool nn development.
>>
>>8980327
Pretty much the only way a "mind upload" would work, and decades away at a minimum, although this guy's pretty sure he can freeze your brain in plastic for later "uploading" in a highly destructive process after the plastic effectively kills you...
http://www.brainpreservation.org/overview/
PROTIP: wait until you're dying already before giving these guys a phone call...
>>
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (226KB, 1920x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
226KB, 1920x1080px
>>8980396
>the structure is an overly conflated mess. We don't need to do that
>citation needed
So... which subset of the net we need to include?
>>
>>8980327
Have you ever put strain on a rope bridge?
The ropes eventually break.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3