Could someone explain all this to a non-scientist?
The physics, astronomy, theoretical physics and this kind of thing catches my attention, but I do not understand it because I do not have the slightest idea of what gets to speak.
1.- https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-multiverses-measure-problem-20141103
2.- https://www.quantamagazine.org/to-avoid-the-multiverse-physicists-propose-a-symmetry-of-scales-20140818
(I know it may not be easy work to explain it to someone who understands little about physics)
You're too stupid for this shit, get over it.
>>8972888
1. The universe expanded from a non-anything that might have expanded in other places to make other universes, maybe they're different if they're there at all?
2. Universes in every particle. Pure wankery.
>>8972888
Waste of trips but if the physics actually caught your attention you'd have your nose a in a book right now not romanticizing these concepts that are out of your league
I mean it only as motivation
>>8972926
not OP but thanks im gonna go look at my textbook now
>>8972888
Where does a sound wave end?
Where does it begin?
Wibbely Wobely Timey Wimey Stuff
"It's magic I ain't gotta explain shit!"
>>8973278
>Where does a sound wave end?
It doesn't
>Where does it begin?
at the beginning
t. mathematician
>to avoid
Scientists are becoming obscurantists of their own
>>8972888
Everything in the field of physics more complicated than force vectors is pure religion. If the physicist-shaman spews words about it, but no engineer has applied it, it is physicist phantasy phiction
>>8972913
>2. Universes in every particle. Pure wankery.
You didn't even read that did you?
>>8973388
>subtly implying energy doesn't distort spacetime
phuck oph
>>8972888
Pick up Stephen Hawking's The Universe in a Nutshell. It's modern physics for normies.
Nobody here can give you the answers you seek.
Only through complete submission to the divine will of Allah will you achieve peace and clarity.