Would being more swole help prevent against injury in a car crash?

File: graham.jpg.png (450KB, 792x508px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 792x508px

According to Australian science, you want to be built as similar to Graham as possible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YyWbOAu6S8

Hahahaha are you (and I'm seriously asking) retarded?

>>8969747
in general muscles absorb impact, more muscles == less damage
being swole also just makes you healthier in general, you'll heal faster and shit

>>8971283
a nice layer of fat does the same trick, even better

>>8971308
not really.

i do boxing. you can tense muscle, you cant tense fat. its easier to hurt fatties than fit people.
then again fatties usually have less experience, so either they havent learned to take a punch yet or their form is shitty and they take punches badly

>>8971317
how about a knife then

>>8969747
>>8969753
I have zero idea why having muscle mass in other places wouldn't help and I believe it would especially preventing spinal injury with a well developed posterior chain.

But in terms of research I do know we tend to find a negative correlation between neck strength and likely hood of concussion.

>>8971308
being fat is mor dangerous because the seatbelt is stopping slower

you can pull a seatbelt out but if you pull to fast it will stop

if your skiny the seatbelt will sit firmly on your muscels and bone structure and will almost instantly stop if your body is thrown forward.

if your fat and crash the seatbelt has to move throught the fat to stop this causes the seatbelt to stop a few split seconds later but in a crash this can be a lot.

>>8971588
>being fat is mor dangerous because the seatbelt is stopping slower
What?

The seat belt is strong and pyrotechnically tightened. If you go through that the seatbelt will act like a cheese string.