Looking for actual scientific study of UFOs. Not muh aliums not

>>8956770
>>>/x/

>>8956775
Fuck off, /x/ is just succubi and transcendence. I came here for actual SCIENCE.

>>8956770
Type Ufology into google and click on thing which don't read like total clickbait.

>>8956780
Pseudoscience belongs on >>>/x/. Go.

>>8956782
Already found MUFON, ufoevidence, all that stuff.

>>8956784
Research into an unexplained phenomenon in the skies is not pseudoscience.

>>8956786
Ufology was serious business during 40's and 50's, and after it was pretty much confirmed that people love to make shit up and actual sightings always turn out to be something ordinary, the interest among scientific community dropped and amateur shit is all you're gonna get at this point.

I was into these things for a while, but when I've learned that even rock solid stuff like Oliver's Castle video from frigin 1996 was staged by professional crop circle makers, I stopped caring.

>>8956770


Project Sign, Project Grudge (USA, 1947–1949)
Flying Saucer Working Party (UK, 1950–1951)
Project Magnet, Project Second Story (Canada, 1950–1954)
Project Blue Book Special Report No. 14 (USA, 1952–1954)
Robertson Panel (USA, 1953)
Condon Committee (USA, 1966–1968)
RAND Corporation paper (USA, 1968)
Project Identification (USA, 1973–1980)
Studies by GEPAN, SERPA & GEIPAN (France, 1977–present)
United Nations (1977–1979)
Project Hessdalen / Project EMBLA (Norway, 1983–present / Italy 1999–2004)
Project Condign (UK, 1996–2000)
Sturrock Panel Report (USA, 1997)
COMETA Report (France, 1999)
"Disclosure Project" Press Conference (USA, 2001)
Fife Symington Press Conference (USA, 2007)

>>8957456
Thank you! Finally some real research.