/sci/ can't prove that all even numbers can be represented

2 = 1 + 1
4 = 3 + 1
6 = 5 + 1
Etc.
Solved by induction

>>8954276
Isn't one excluded from the set of all prime numbers?

>>8954279
If so then OP is a cum-guzzling faget who can't even bait correctly

>>8954280
Not OP, but is this sum of two primes thing one of those theorems that can't be proven?

I have discovered a truly remarkable proof of this theorem which this post's character limit is too small to contain.

>>8954284
It's the Goldbach conjecture and it's for all even numbers greater than 2.

I don't know if it can't be proven, but it hasn't been proven yet.

>>8954276
Doesn't work for 10 senpai.

10 = 9 + 1

9 isn't prime.

>>8954303
7+3
now
go
kill
your
self

>>8954284
why can't it be proven
it seems pretty easy to prove it by contradiction r something

>>8954270
0 is even, and cannot be represented as a sum of prime numbers.
Checkmate, queer.

>>8954318
Then do it

>>8954323
>queer
Obviously OP meant even numbers greater than 2, you homophobic cretin.

>>8954330
> homophobic
Check out the sociologist

/sci/ can't prove every odd number greater than 5 is the sum of a prime number and a double of a prime.

7 = 3 + 2 * 2
9 = 5 + 2 * 2
11 = 5 + 3 * 2
13 = 3 + 5 * 2
etc.

File: 3D9B410600000578-0-image-a-65_1487936222981.jpg (85KB, 634x788px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 634x788px

>>8954270
I actually have proved this on toilet paper while drunk.
Unfortunately I used the paper and could not recognize anything written on it in the morning.

>>8954276
>solved by induction
kek

>>8954270
You can't write 2 as the sum of two primes.

>>8955893
p+q=2 where p and q are primes
QED

>>8954280
Well he's right that we cannot prove a false statement

>>8954270
I can if you allow prime numbers to be negative

File: scientific software.jpg (24KB, 350x386px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 350x386px

>>8954276