lets be clear F=ma Q=mv2/2 Why does Americans show always

>>8952672
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzXiBEgP0rc

>>8952672
The man who saved Japan.

File: Blank_b108b9_6254455.jpg (48KB, 393x462px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 393x462px

>>8952672
>Q=mv2/2
>not [math]E_c=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}[/math]

Let's be clear.
Heat is a transmission of energy with no macroscopic effect.
Temperature is the potential to transmit internal energy.

Why do Americans always call temperature the average kinetic energy of atoms and heat is the total energy? Did they all graduate from Mumbai University of Poo?

>Why does Americans show always use F=ma to measure impact energy?

Why do foreigners always use extremely poor grammar when asking questions?

>>8952763
Because U= 3/2 nkT?

>>8952696
I think you mean E_k or T

>>8952987
guys use clearly defined thermodynamical definitions or stop being so inexact. pick one

>exact

>hand waving

PICK

>>8952992
>>8952987
wasnt meant only to you, mostly the guys you replied to and the one before him

>>8952987
>All bodies are ideal gases
I want highschoolers to leave.

t. CompEng junior

>>8953011
>thread is about F=m*a
>and some kinetic energy equation or whatever

>some guy mentions inner energy of ideal gases

>who is the high schooler now, OP or the gas guy ?

>>8953011
Physics Masters actually.

Guy asked why people assume that - give the most common form people find heat in. Even for non idealised gases dU =Cv dT at const pressure/volume. There is a clear relation

>>8953035
ehh

you mean Cv for constant volume and Cp for constant pressure.

and nobody mentioned that shit. go away.

>>8953044
Ahh true, though at no point in stat phys did we actually use Cp. In fact in every course we were told to take Cp=Cv at both unis I've been to.
>Americans always call temperature the average kinetic energy
kinetic theory gives U ~ <E_k>

>>8953062
*i.e. why I mentioned it in the first place

>>8952989
>E_k
oh, right in english its kinetic and not cinetic
still better than using Q or T