>Fill in the blank. As the rest of 4chan gets worse, /sci/

worse

>>8927368
worser

>>8927368
4chanier

>>8927368
Catgirls!

redditier

>>8927368
niggier

>>8927751
/pol/

meaner.

>>8927368
More like /b/ but without dickchicks and its bait threads are thinly veiled as being loosely related to science and math

diluted as well.

>>8927368
better by comparison but still worse

>>8927752
T. Nigger

>>8927368
even deader than it was a few years ago

1 post per hour when?

>>8927368
brainletier

File: lol.png (140KB, 500x486px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 500x486px

>>8927368
more like pic related

imo sci has a low population but high turnover and remains basically the same throughout 4chan history.

sci also follows a bunch of basic trends like ""/x/"" posts (free energy, psychology, flat earth...etc), IQ posts, i hate popular science man posts, academic posts (what should i major in, i hate this major, x major is better than y major)

in other words there isn't that much subject variety here and theres very little opposing opinion room

quality has dropped very steadily but not that quickly over the years

>>8927368
filled with edgy teenagers

>>8928386
You mean 'bate threads and bait threads. Wink wink nudge nudge faggot.

On a more serious note, I can't remember this site ever being so bad. Bait is rampant.

The 4chan pass let's you skip captcha, right? Can't you just buy it and then automate shit posting? I get the feeling that the bait threads are automated but I haven't bothered to confirm my theory.

Hi /sci/ I'm a PhD student in psychology and I really don't appreciate my field not being thought of as a 'real science' Yes, I know that not every study is reproducible, but come on. It's 2016 after all, and psychology really is part of the sciences.

>>8927368
stupider