Prove you're not a brainlet. Take a screenshot of how much

>>8926959
0%. I win. kys op

>>8926962
Could you elaborate on what the acronym K.Y.S stands for?

>>8926991
I think he means the K.Y.S theorem named after (Kaczynski - Young - Sarmiento) about necessary and sufficient conditions for you to kill yourself

>>8927027
Interesting.

Can you post a link to the Wikipedia page?

Nothing. I've gone to a good uni, so I haven't felt the need to use a resource for third-world autodidacts.

>>8926959
None because I actually learned it in school

Just skimmed through a couple of lectures on that site, but it feels more like high school material. Very sparse too.

>>8926959
All those courses are easy as hell. I've taken them all with the exception of some of the computing ones and some of the economics ones.

If you are 18 or younger, that's very impressive. If you are older than 19, then I'm not impressed at all lmao.

>>8926991
>Could you elaborate on what the acronym K.Y.S stands for?


i have really struggled with whether and how to respond to this. The execution of this message was very nice and respectful, and I genuinely appreciate that. The premise, however, is problematic. Maybe not inherently, but within the context of the sexist society we live in. Men are allowed, and often feel compelled, to think out loud at women, to share unsolicited not necessarily informed thoughts at women. (And usually these men, unlike you, don’t even seem to recognize that their thoughts may not be useful.) Women on the other hand aren’t allowed to be as open. So, if you want to not just be respectful, but actually be anti-oppression, it is better (IMO) not to respond to a woman’s work with the types of thoughts that other men pawn off as insights, if you know what i mean. again, i appreciate your honesty, but i feel obligated to point these things out.

>>8927182
he hasn't even completed precalc. how is that impressive?

>>8927436
It's impressive because op only took one day to complete all those subjects.