/sci/, who would you say are the greatest 5 scientific/mathematical

The sassy black NASA women who singlehandedly got us to the moon

>>8915566
What did she do exactly, was she anything more than a glorified calculator?

>>8915565
albert

>>8915576
Gonna need 4 more mate...

For me, I'd go Einstein, Hilbert, Goedel, Grothendieck and Bohr.

>>8915565
In terms of raw intellect, Von Neumann

>>8915582
Oh shit, I'd probably substitute him for Grothendieck then.

>>8915565
Tesla, Musk, Einstein, Feynman, Barnett

>>8915587
Musk, for real?

Also, Tesla is criminally overrated...

Tesla Premium Electric Sedans and SUVs, Richard Dawkins, Graham Hancock, Joe Rogan, A Beautiful Mind (John Nash)

>>8915587
Kek
>>8915579
I might've substitute Witten or Dirac for Bohr but overall correct.

>>8915597
Is Witten really that good, I'm not familiar with him...

>>8915604
Absolutely, he's basically Grothendieck-like in physics where he has certainly contributed some extraordinary papers (and has won a fields medal too) but his methodology is what has been most important as it ignited his generation and will inspire many future generations.

>>8915594
Dip a it's you meme

Mochizuki, Hawking, Musk, Wildberger, Tao

>>8915579
>Bohr

The guys who's model of the building blocks of the universe was wrong? Top kek, Bohr was a fucking brainlet with his alchemy-tier atoms.

>>8915565
EULER THE SWISS MAD MAN

>>8915646
Youler, GauB, Archimemes, Rampoonajan

1. Steve Jobs
2. Elon Musk
3. Carl Sagan
4. Isaac Newton
5. Stephen Hawkings

Einsten, Oppenheimer, Bohr, Heisenburg, Planck

>>8915565
frank zappa

>>8915565
pointcarrier

>>8915654
nice b8