>engineering friend thought this proof from his hw was difficult
Why are engineers such brainlets?
>>8882323
>Not defining H(X)
you might be an engineer too
>>8882323
I have no idea what H does. kys yourself
>>8882350
>defining H(X) on an information theory HW assignment
>>8882360
>offering no definitions or even context, then asking for a proof
ok
let H(X)=ISOPAFAGGOT(X)=1
therefore H(Y) always equals H(X)
therefore H(Y) <= H(X)
QED
>>8882370
who the flying fuck is asking for a proof? the OP is a trivial proof and I am laughing at my engineer friend for being such a fucking brainlet that he couldn't figure it out
if you cannot honestly tell from the context of that question that H(X) is entropy then I'm guessing you're some stupid nigger and/or American who never took anything beyond lower division maths
for fucks sake the quality of this board is fucking garbage
>>8882382
What's the point of this thread? To blog about your friend? Or are you baiting someone into providing a proof because you are retarded? Either way your thread is garbage and you are a massive faggot.
>>8882370
Good post
>>8882467
Triggered brainlet Americunt engineer detected
Go suck a dick
>>8882382
>h-haha guys i forgot to say H(X) is entropy
kys
>>8882609
how could you not tell?
>discrete random variable
>deterministic function
Literally what else could it mean? Have you literally never taken a course on information theory? are American universities really this brainlet encouraging?
>>8882621
They're both dynamic systems terms.
> Have you literally never taken a course on information theory?
no. not a cs fag.
>>8882661
>information theory is CS
Its applied maths and physics
>>8882323
Great logic there friend.
Op is a faggot
>>8882323
Nice blogpost, where can I subscribe?