Have any of you read Christopher Langan's CTMU? Did it give

The idea of the universe as a recursive computer is interesting. I did find some ideas valuable. I just wish Langan would simplify his arguments to make reading them easier.

>>8878377
>Did it give you any unique insights?
Yes. IQ alone is a shit measure of intelligence.

>>8878391
Looks like someone couldn't understand Mr. Genius's big words.

File: neilsbohr-071012.jpg (32KB, 875x583px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 875x583px

I know it's mean nothing but he doesn't have the facial features of high IQ.

Was he properly tested independently multiples times with steady scores ?

File: 1493531351230.png (1MB, 1340x2458px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1340x2458px

>>8878377

>>8879852
>newton above euclid
>no erdos
>tesla below einstein
>no abel
shit tier meme chart

>>8878377
nice 3 threads about this guy

>>8878381
Yes. There is substance to his ideas, but he writes in a very convoluted style, using non standard meanings and definitions which you could only know if you read all of his citations. It comes off as very obvious that his writing is there to make him seem smart

>>8879879
>>tesla below einstein
Rightfully so.
Back to >>>/x/, or Reddit if you wish.

>>8879892

Any kind of shitposting seems refreshing after the spectrum autist.

It made me see how much I wish sci was good... The second insight is fuck mods for deleting university problems as "homework" because it'd be a ton more interesting than horseshit Langan.

File: 00000000.png (2MB, 1464x2124px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1464x2124px

>>8879852
>>8879879
ftfy