3/3 = 3+1/3+1 = 1 2/2 = 2+1/2+1 = 1 1/1= 1+1/1+1 = 1 0/0 = 0+1/0+1

why does 0/0 need to have a value?

a value of 0 in the denominator is always undefined so impossible.

-1/-1 = ????

>>8857624
0 isn't a number

>>8857632
It doesn't need to have value, it just so happens that it does.

>>8857624
0/0 is considered indeterminate, you disgusting brainlet. This is because you could put a 1,2, pi, or any other value on the LHS. For example,
0/0 = x
0 = 0*x, which is true for all x.

Now fuck off and never post this bait again.

You cannot divide something or nothing by nothing.

>>8857666
No, it does not.

File: women called faggot.jpg (39KB, 350x708px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 350x708px

Pic related is OP

File: Screenshot_20170425-224118.jpg (74KB, 1254x1111px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1254x1111px

>>8857681
Explain this brainlet

>>8857713
Are you trying to imply that 0 = 1 = 2 = ... ?

>>8857713
shoddy programming

>>8857624
Domain restriction

>>8857713
0 = True <=> False <=> 1

>>8857721
0=0+1=1+1=2+1=3 ...

>>8857682
>There is no "zero"! Nothing is not a number!
>You can't do a-b if b>a! It makes no sense!
>Well, what you absolutely can't do is to take a square root of negative numbers! It just doesn't make SENSE!

File: 1492431831001.png (67KB, 1316x1152px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1316x1152px

>>8857624

>0/3 = 0
>0/2 = 0
>0/1 = 0
>0/0 = 1

File: Screenshot_20170425-232229.jpg (76KB, 1347x817px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1347x817px

>>8857770

>but it is TRUE, i tell you

>>8857624
wow ebin math :DDDD

0/0 = 1
2*(0/0) = 2
2 = 2*(0/0) = (2*0)/0 = 0/0 = 1

broof that 2 = 1
:----DD

File: Screenshot_20170426-000122.jpg (77KB, 1033x1085px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1033x1085px

>>8857909

Done

any number divided by 0 equals +-∞. That undefined, out-of-bounds bullshit is for precal noobs.

>>8857653
Yes it is you fucking retard. Go back to grade school math faggot.

>>8858724
>equals +-∞
Wrong.
These arent real numbers it makes no sense talking about "equal".

>visit sci for first time
>expecting everyone to be smart
>see this shit
Ya fuck this

>>8859016
Infinity has numerical properties and behaves like any number in many cases. So blow it out your ass.

>>8858724
Kys brainlet. 4/0=infinity? well then it should be infinity * 0=4 is it true? No. Jesus you're stupid. Go back to kindergarden.

>>8857624
3/3 = 3 + 1/3 + 1 = 1
3 + 1/3 + 1 = 1
3+1/3 = 0 ??

ignoring the division by 0 for a moment, am i missing something?

>>8857624
3+1/3+1 = 1 is wrong.

>>8857624
3/3=3+1/3+1=1+0/1+0=-0+1/0-1=-1*0+1

2/2=2+1/2+1=1+0/1+0=-0+1/01=-1*0+1

1/1=1+1/1+1=1+0/1+0=-0+1/0-1=-1*0+1

0/0=0*1/0*1=1*0+0*1=0

>>8857624
>3/3 = 3+1/3+1
What?

>>8857624
>i apply this rule of math and discard the other rule
>woa why is this wrong?!!

>>8857624

Reductio ad absurdum.

The rules of addition are not the rules of division, nor can division be derived from the rules of addition.

File: Screenshot_20170426-164916.jpg (211KB, 1302x908px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1302x908px

>>8857624

1=2 - true = true/2=2 true -1 false=false/true = true=0.5+1.5 false= 1 (((3/3)))=1 true +1=1-false=-0.5 false

3/3 = 9/3 + 1/3 + 3/3 (= 3 + 1/3 + 1)

What kind of math is this bullshit?
>not even correct
do your math right

>>8858851
Calling 0 a number is like calling "nothing" a feeling. You can say "I feel nothing" and you can say "I have 0 apples" but that doesn't mean that "nothing" is an feeling or that 0 is a number.
>>8859100
>Infinity has numerical properties and behaves like any number in many cases
Just like 0, which is also not a number.

>>8857681
>0/0 is considered indeterminate,
Please go find out what that term means before throwing it into conversations to which it is not in any way related.

>>8860390


3/3=1/1=1

3/3=1^3=1*1*1=1=3/3
3/3=(1/3)*3=3/3=1
3/3=3/1*1root9=3/(1/3)=3/(3/3)=3*1/1=3/3=1

>>8857624
Why didn't you try -1/-1 anon?

>>8857624
Because x is strictly different than x+1, assuming x is any complex number
>>8857713
0/0=a*0/0 for all a with the same assumption.

0/3 = 0
0/2 = 0
0/1 = 0
0/0 = 0
Why is this wrong?

>>8860686
Why is this wrong?


Because you made a mistake on the last one.

0/0 = 1

>>8857640
>doesn't understand limits

>>8860357
>>8857969
>>8857857
>>8857713
what the heck

So I'm reading What's Mathematics and it basically says that all math past natural number operations is pure convention. How fair is that assessment?

>>8857969
> print("The number is false.")

>>8857624
0/3 = 0
0/2 = 0
0/1 = 0
0/0 = 0

>>8857681
Indeterminate forms really only apply when you are talking about lhopitals rule m8.

The real reason this doesn't work is because the ring of fractions with respect to a multiplicatively closed subset S is just the zero ring if 0 is in S.

File: photo[1].jpg (116KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 900x900px

>>8861464
>implying anything except 1 is not just convention

How many times can you take 0 away from 0 to get 0?

>>8860796
You can approach zero as a denominator, but you can never reach it because it's undefined.