Is there any proven method for memorizing lots of stuff in little

We've found the biggest brainlet piggot (pig + faggot, fyi) on /sci/, people. Look at OP, laugh at his inferior intellect and increase your self-esteem by sucking confidence from OP like an autistic vampire.

>>8856774
I'm a brainlet for being in a situation where I need to memorize something? Ok.

>>8856782
Repetition.
Writing it down or saying it outloud.
Visualization(if applicable)

>>8856782
nobody is asking you to memorize a completely random sequence of words you fucking piggot

I'm sure there is a logic behind all that information. Even a sequence of words related to History, Psycholoy or some SJW shit has a logic behind it. Only brainlets memorize shit like robots. But wait, even robots have compression algorithms. Hhahahahah you're beneath the level of a robot, you putrid pig,

method of loci. some people are very quick with it, though for me it takes me like 10-20 minutes to memorize a shuffled deck of cards. some people can do a deck of cards in 20-30 seconds.

your spatial memory is better than you think it is.

>>8856797
Chinese characters.

>>8856799
*puts his hand on your temples and crushes your head like a watermelon*
You inferior brainlet, you are beneath me. Your brain does not deserve to exist and I destroyed it. No loss in computational power has occurred in humanity's overall computational power after the destruction of your inferior brain.

Loci is a meme, there are better ways. You do not have to constrain yourself by following pre-existing methods that are not adapted to the unique wiring of your brain.

>>8856804
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_(Chinese_characters)

>A Chinese radical (Chinese: 部首; pinyin: bùshǒu; literally: "section header") is a graphical component of a Chinese character under which the character is traditionally listed in a Chinese dictionary. This component is often a semantic indicator (that is, an indicator of the meaning of the character)

You've yet to hit the level of axioms, the level at which you cannot decompose the information any further.

>>8856809
>Radical
Yes, and there are about 200 of those.

>>8856815
It's still much easier to memorize those than to memorize each individual chinese character as if it was unique.

Of course you can't reduce all information to a fucking bit, to one character, you stupid piggot. But tell me, now, what's easier? Isn't it easier to memorize the radicals and then use them to make learning the chinese alphabet much easier?

Do not reply to me again. I am permanently tired of your stupidity.

>>8856822
>It's still much easier to memorize those than to memorize each individual chinese character as if it was unique
Show me the post where I say I want to memorize all of them. I always intended to learn the radicals, which still counts as "lots of stuff". You aren't doing anything but bringing up the obvious.

>>8856832
I'm not that guy but he told you not to reply to him and you did not respect his wish. Why did you do this?

>>8856844
>I'm not that guy but
>poster count doesn't go up