Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1491425587420.png (17KB, 746x600px) Image search:
[Google]
17KB, 746x600px
Hi Guys, i'm mostly a /fit/ poster. We deal with a lot of bs science from nutrition peoples, fatties, etc. They change everything all around every year. So I was thinking about all this "march for science" stuff.
How do you tell which science is real, like you can build bridges with it, and which science is mostly about female spirits inhabiting 40 year old trannies? They both come from universities and they are all peer reviewed and such. But there seems to be a big difference between a bridge and a female spirit inside of buffallo bill lol.
>>
>>8850443
fun fact: nobody in that march had PhDs and no modern scientist attended to that march.
that should give you an idea about liberal """science"""
>>
all science is either physics or stamp collecting
>>
>>8850480
go away kaku
>>
>>8850465
this
If they actually protested for science their cries would've been more legitimate.
>>
>>8850482
you go away to classify ants or something
>>
>>8850465
fun fact: wrong
>>
General rule: If it comes from Psychology, Sociology, or Political Science, you can ignore it. That's not to say that the fields are completely useless, you just shouldn't trust anything from them.
>>
>>8850443
Logic says that transexuals have a very advanced form of insanity where the brain believes its the opposite of the chromosome its very neurons have.
>>
File: 220px-Stephanie_2.jpg (23KB, 220x309px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 220x309px
>>8850443
You need to learn to instinctively be able to recognize good science from bad science. This takes time.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2