Is global warming real? I'm on the fence, and may of said it wasn't real a few times in my life. Please post evidence of both sides!
>>8842513
cant you just read one of the other 5 climate change denier shit posting threads on the front page? did you really have to make another one?
I always went with the IPCC reports
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg1/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
There is expert consensus that earths climate is unequivocally warming, largely due to human influence
>>8842536
IPCC is under NASA, and was caught manipulating data in the early 2000s.
Climate change is not primarily anthropogenic.
>>8842558
bullshit
https://www.epa.gov/climate-change-science/causes-climate-change
its real. The human contribution is real. shills will deny this
>>8842558
IPCC is not under NASA, clue is in the name, it's intergovernmental
>>8842568
Nice copy pasta faggot.
Projections by climate "scientists" have time and time again to be absolutely and totally inaccurate.
They have no idea what the projection for "natural" influences is.
>shills
>on 4chan
and here's your sign.
>>8842601
>not an expert role playing to be smarter than actual experts
yeah go fuck yourself
>>8842732
not the previous anon,but why do you appeal to authority,when we dont trust your authority.?
global warming is obviously real in some way, the cause, effect, etc. are also obviously a lot more difficult to nail down. climate scientists are not necessarily wrong, but are also known to be full of shit. just know that shit may or may not be getting warmer and this may or may not kill us all, and there's literally nothing you can do to change it
>>8842768
how can a statement that literally makes no conclusive solid statement other than
>global warming is real
bullshit.
>>8842577
Yeah, NASA would be under IPCC and will manipulate data points for their masters serving as a metadata feedstock for the propaganda mill of number salad.