So this is the power of math. Using mathematical formulas increases

> nothing changes

The probability distribution changes when you receive additional information.

yes, and the sum of all natural numbers is -0.999.../12

>>8837707
[math]1+2+3+4+...=\dfrac{e^{\pi i}}{11.999...}[/math]

>>8837693
simulate it with a computer you fucktard.

You will see that the mathematics is right and accurately describes reality.

>>8838846
Wouldn't that only make sense if door 1 and 2 were opened at the same time

>>8838850
1.) player selected #3
2.) monty opened #1

Helene is so proud that this problem credits a woman's logical ability. She probably uses the result to motivate her betrayal of everyone she collaborates with.

Consider this new problem which disproves Monty Hall:

There are two doors. One has a car, the other has a goat. Monty asks you to pick one of the two doors. There's no trick here, the chance of a car is currently 50/50, easy.

Before the doors are opened, Monty opens a third door which was hidden, revealing a goat. He then asks if you'd like to switch doors.

By statsfag logic, your chances of winning if you switch are 2/3rds, but that doesn't make sense and simulations don't support it, even though this problem is identical to the classical Monty Hall problem since in that, Monty always opens a goat door anyways.

>>8838892
(You)

>>8837693
The solution to this problem is so easy to understand that I must assume that anyone on /sci/ saying they don't believe in it must be only pretending to be retarded.

>>8838892
>problem is identical
wrong

>>8838892
>t. undergrad

>>8837693
Oh not the stupid goat shit again

>>8838892
bait asf. but if it's not, don't worry. even paul erdos thought it was wrong. then later when the computer simulation was shown to him, he agreed.

>>8838892
Consider the following:
1000 doors, 999 goats, 1 car
You pick a door, 998 other doors open revealing goats, which leaves only two doors closed, one of them being your choice. Since there's only a probability of 1/1000 that you picked the car from the beginning you switch to the other door.

>>8838892

>In one scenario, you have 1/3 chance of picking car on initial pick

>In another scenario, you have 1/2 chance of picking car on initial pick

>>>>>>>>>even though this problem is identical to the classical Monty Hall problem

bait plz

This fucking thread again

just post it on /v/ or something

>computer simulations represent reality
Yeah a computer working with the exact probability programmed in works the same as a true random chance in reality. You guys are fucking idiots.

>>8839162
its getting fucking annoying
if brainlets cant understand this problem they need to fuck themselves and fuck off

>>8838838
The simitations are wrong. Sticking with a door is the same as choosing that door with a 1/2 chance.

>>8839111
This