>purposely use dumb as fuck bro language to perfectly describe

>>8824523
I do the same thing brah

>>8824523
Top lel I do this as well.

>>8824523
woah bruh, chill out man! It's just language doing its thing yo. fo' real

You're doing God's work, Anonymous.

>>8824523
>> yfw your advisor/professor does this

Good.

Being able to talk about difficult things using simple language is a sign that you understand what you talk about.
If you need fancy words, you may not understand the concept behind them, only when to use them.
Or even worse when people are being deliberately pretentious: Look at me, I know all the best words. Aren't I clever :D

>professor thoroughly defines something
>brainlet: "oh, you mean {nonrigorous interpretation}? why didn't you just say that?"
>turns around, as if expecting applause from classmates

>>8824523
I did this once unconscionably because I had a lot of things on my mind and was warned to not do it again.

I'd be perfectly OK with a student using 'regular' words to describe the subject matter. As long as they demonstrate they understand, it's fine with me. In fact, I prefer it over a student trying to come off as smarter than they are.

>>8824523
When I really get into homework I end uo writing proofs in casual language, like if I was out drinking with the bros.

>>8824638
This. The more you understand something, the more diluted you man make it verbally. If you can only convey something through the same pretty, big words, you have memorized it, not understood it.

its the feynman technique at work. Good on you OP.

>>8824650
Freshmen using nonrigorous as if it's a swear word never fails to make me laugh.

>>8824682
You only understand it if you can explain it to a 6yo

>>8825536
Still better than freshmen spouting nonrigorous bullshit about stuff they don't understand.

>>8826329


You only understand it if you can explain it to an autistic 2 yo using only sign language in 5 minutes