can someone provide me with a brief yet thorough summary on why the world's best mathematicians cannot understand his proof?
>>8814198
>>8776174
Read the snippets or the whole .PDF.
>>8814198
Because he spent thousands of pages making up new words and everybody else in the field had no idea what the fuck he was saying
Because he basically created a new area of math that first needs to be understood by the brainlets.
>>8814205
>https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/files/symcor.iut.html
none of these guys were brainlets and yet they didnt understand shit
>>8814206
> Andrew Wiles
>>8814198
No one was really reading his ~10 years of previous work. Also he invented all this new shit, yet isn't very good at explaining it (and has made little to no effort to assist people in understanding).
>>8814209
>and has made little to no effort to assist people in understanding
False. Read the verification report.
>>8814206
>none of these guys were brainlets and yet they didnt understand shit
Hoshi and Yamashita are known to have gone though Mochizuki's theory more than once.
progress on IUT is going well. expect confirmation for abc theorem in ~5 years.
>>8814198
Because many of them don't work in that specific area of math and can't afford to invest a significant amount of time in reading thousands of pages of completely new material that is irrelevant to their research.
Some people have indeed read his work and are starting to think that it's likely correct
>>8814201
rekt