Is it quantum mechanically possible, that in a tank full of water,

>>8807905
Not enough energy

>>8807909
Let's increase the size of the tank, pressure of water, and temperature of water then

At least a few water molecules would need to break down, the nuclei can't fuse with electrons around, and losing those means no molecules. Then there would have to be immense pressure to get the nuclei to fuse. In conditions where the rest of the tank is water, there would not be enough pressure to accomplish this. The free nuclei would steal electrons from around them making fusion impossible in any case.

>>8807909
>>8807922

t. brainlets

>>8807922
We have a hard enough time changing hydrogen into helium. What the hell are you even talking about?

>>8807996
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling

>>8807957
>>8807996
Brainlets
The question is if it's technically possible, which yes it is but unfathomably unlikely.

>>8807957
>>8808078
I assumed being a brainlet was a qualification for all /sci/ posters. That's why you're circlejerking here instead of doing important things like working, studying, or researching.

>>8808078
Nobody cares about "unfathomably unlikely". If it is possible, people will do it later. Brainlets always say some stuff is unlikely and it happens. L2P.

File: woo lord.jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>8808070
QUANTUM WOO
U
A
N
T
U
M

W
O
O

>>8807905
no. quantum wave functions represent the probability distribution of position and momentum.

Nothing about any of that can make water turn into gold.