Why hasn't anyone found a formula for finding the nth prime, /sci/?
Genuinely disturbs me, we've had this clearly defined set of numbers for thousands of years and nobody has found a formula for generating the nth prime.
What gives, /sci/? Is it impossible or are we as a species just too stupid to find it?
>>8786078
The formula and proof was posted a week ago, retard.
I found it, will release data for $10 million
>>8786078
There are algorithms, they are just extremely slow.
>>8786087
Sure, you can brute force prime numbers, but you can't input something into your calculator to find the nth prime.
>>8786102
Calculators also use algorithms...
Heh, I am glad we have not found it yet OP.
Fucking brainlets who still think functions are not algorithms, when will they learn ?
>>8786083
You mean that horrible non-closed form formula that was literally ripped off from wolfram
Top fucking kek. That shit is basically a prime generating algorithm bullshitted into an expression via defining various functions.
>>8786083
Indeed, but here it is again:
>>8786111
You have a pretty weird calculator if there's an option to brute force prime numbers.
Let me rephrase, you can't find the nth prime without resorting to brute force.
>>8786078
There are formulas:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrimeFormulas.html
>>8786131
What else do you fucking want? It's still a formula just not an elegant one. What exactly do you want? A function that only uses basic arithmetic that's in terms of "n"? Can it have transcendental functions?