It's there any genius who started late (30) or does it mean

>>8769717
you're fucked

delete your thread and go away

>>8769727
you can't delete threads any more

>>8769717
If you actually cared about making it, you wouldn't need the approval of a Samoan tribal painting convention.
You're just looking for excuses not to try.

>>8769754
>let's ignore brain plasticity stops after 25

File: Chicken.jpg (126KB, 808x500px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 808x500px

Reminder: /sci/ is for discussing topics pertaining to science and mathematics, not for helping you with your homework or helping you figure out your career path.

If you want advice regarding college/university or your career path, go to /adv/ - Advice.

If you want help with your homework, go to /wsr/ - Worksafe Requests.

>>8769717
https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-delayed-prodigies-in-physics-maths

>>8769756
That's been debunked pretty fucking strongly already. It's not the 20th century anymore.

>>8769717
colonel sanders was 100 years old when he sold KFC for a trillion dollars. you can do it anon!

>>8769717
You don't need to be a genius to be brilliant in your own rite. Anyone can be brilliant if you study hard enough and put enough time into a subject.

>>8769717
solidarity bro. follow your dreams.

>>8769776
Not the same guy, but do you have a solid source on that? I'm just being open-minded

>>8769761
Like the mods will do anything. This place has been /pol/ jr. and no action has been seen.

>>8769717
what subject you're talking about?
how much knowledge do you know about the subject?
why are you interested in this subject?

>>8770323
being a polymath.

>>8769762
The examples of people who completely switched careers and quickly became luminaries in their new fields are a pretty good answer to OP's question.
Of course those people were already considered brilliant in their old fields so unless OP has 160+ IQ I don't know how much hope he should derive from that.