I'm 21 years old, left handed and am interested in training to become ambidextrous. What are the neurological benefits of making cross dominance intuitive? Do I need to be aware of any potential compromise to my way of thinking?
I've read somewhere that cross dominance leads to lower over all performance in both areas. Having dominance in one hand is the best way to go. Of course I'd double check on your own because I'm too lazy to look it up.
>>8754392
>I've read
If you can tell me where you read it, I'm not believing a god damn word you say.
>>8754400
Can't *
>>8754400
You don't have to believe it. That's why I suggested YOU look it up if you're interested because I don't want to.
>>8754407
OP here
I briefly surveyed the internet for studies on this topic, but I couldn't find anything like my particular case. There seems to be a consensus leaning toward mix handedness being indicative of higher risk in neurological problems, but the studies are only done in relation to children, and in few numbers.
Any neuroscience majors in /sci/ who would like to give there 2 cents?
>>8754385
>born left handed
>not already ambidextrous
Did your parents not beat you as a child when you wrote with your wrong hand?
>>8754428
to add to this, the studies give the implication that they are targeting people who are innately ambidextrous.
>>8754434
They beat me for different reasons.
>>8754437
came here to learn, not to feel.
but then, learning also involve feelings
Ambidextrous here.
Using one hand for the majority of everything is as foreign as Swahili to me.
Sounds like some kind of freakish hell
>>8755353
>You will never know the thrill of jerking off with your off-hand
I pity you
>>8755375
Doesn't your offhand get tired more easily?
>>8754385
you're going to hell :^)
>>8754437
>They beat me for different reasons.
kek