Lets say I have a nice explanation of some unproven theorem but

>>8738741

> Should I share my findings or just be ashamed that im working in such horrible ways?

Wtf just share it. Conjecturing a result is quite important, altough really different from proving a result.

>>8738741
If you want any glory then you shouldn't post anything just yet because if what you are doing is so trivial as to be solved by wolfram then odds are that any mathematician who looks at your sequence can prove your conjecture immediately.

>>8738741
Your picture sickens me, delet it right now

Also your "theorem" is a joke and I don't even need to see it to know that

>>8738745
I would like to because I would like to get some feedback but because >>8738773
I want to wait

>>8738773
Its not totally trivial, I found a way to make some sort of weird induction on recurrence relations. When you solve the recurrence relation and apply a certain mapping you'll eventually end up with multiple x's in your function but you can only induct on specific x's because other parts of the function rely on certain properties of x that arent allowed to be changed when induction is applied.

If would be great if someone already knows anything about this and can say something about it.

>>8739053
>If would be great if someone already knows anything about this and can say something about it.
You gave such a broad description of what you're trying to do that there's no way for anyone to help you.

>>8738741
so basically you're not versed enough in mathematics to write this down on your own/cant prove it.

this might be presumptuous but I would say you may never reach the level of skill needed to prove the conjecture, best just to share your findings.

who knows, its probably nothing. Ive fucked around in mathematics thinking I may be onto something but its nothing.

Let us test the theory on sharing.

Have you seen this before?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=rootz%5E0.5%2Fz%5E3

>>8740756
Yeah, I'd say he should find a genuinely friendly math professor at a local uni to work with on this. They can at least tell you if it's something old.

>>8738741
Well some mathematicians do use mathematica these days, what you are doing is really a cheaper version of that

>>8738741
>Lets say I have a nice explanation
No, let us say you don't.

>>8740760
That's a beautiful plot but there's many, many more of them.