Is mathematics just an extension of philosophy /sci? I'm totally disturbed by that.
Why?
no
most philosophy is not axiomatic at all
>>8730920
mathematics is an extension of philosophy in the sense that it is an advanced version of analytic philosophy, proof of this is that most medieval and ancient mathematical texts pretty much read like analytic philosophy texts today (in that they reason with language, but attempting to be as precise as possible)
>>8730920
no they are both an extension of logic
>>8730928
What? For example, Austrian Economics and Praxeology are 100% axiomatic, do you think they are an extension of mathematics?
motherfucka everything is philosophy
math music politics art astrology and all dat shit
theres literally no limits
>>8730929
but thats exactly what people do today they just use more abstracted notation and still use language to explain their argument
>>8730990
Art is philosophical yet
Art just is~
>>8730920
Philosophy is the parent subject of the STEM subsubjects.
>>8731026
Explain why it is a subject and not the principal foundation of mathematics
>>8731129
Because of semantics.
>>8731135
What did you just say about da Jews?
>>8731145
S-SHUT IT D-DOWN!
It is an extension of logic
>>8731852
No, it is logic, however instead of using words as in the philosophical school of logic, we use symbols.
>>8731855
philosophical logic uses symbols as well
>>8731875
Really? That's interesting, I might start studying logic-logic out of interest.
>>8731876
try 'the logic manual'
>>8730990
If there are no limits, then how do you explain continuity?
>>8731895
Thank you, anon.
>>8730920
In the sense that both mathematics and philosophy are a study of the "possible", and idealizations, yes.
Science is a study of the "actual".
>>8730920
Philosophy is a series of ideas of how the world might work. Logic, math, science, religion, postmodernism are some of those ideas.
>>8730929
So philosophers started doing something fairly recently that mathematicians had been doing long before, and somehow that makes mathematics a subset of philosophy?
You've got it backwards.
>>8731901
There are limits they just get over them
All sciences are just improved elaborate pattern recognitions
Isn't religion philosophy or is it a bunch of bullshit that doesn't exist? I'm thinking the latter.