Daily reminder that if you're not directly contributing

>>8727045
What does it matter? Immortality should be first, cancer second, then everything else. It's not like we'll get to make a socialist automation-based utopia in our lifetimes anyway.

>>8727052
You do understand AGI, if friendly, will give us immortality and cure all ailments? Much faster than we'd get them without AGI.

File: Hello pol.jpg (17KB, 550x346px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 550x346px

>>8727045
"It" reads the shitposts on this website and determines the course of humanity through the power of meme magic. We are all directly contributing towards the creation of true AI. Not just AGI.

>>8727052
I wouldn't want cancer even if I'm immortal.

>>8727052
low iq detected

why are you on /sci/?

>>8727052
>implying those wouldn't be irrelevant on the advent of AGI
When AGI comes about, we as a species will have been fully been superseded. Either we merge into whatever the AGI is by some means, or we die out. Well, we die out as a species either way. "immortality" will never exist but the lifespan of "AGI" could be billions of years if it manages to spread and propagate throughout the universe.

>>8727052
>attain immortality, which implies everything that can kill us is removed or fixed
>cancer second
???
There is no immortality whilst there is cancer. Actually probably the only kind of meaningful "immortality" that can be attained is through shedding our biology and thus cancer too.

>>8728183
He means defeating aging, not death. I know the technical meanings vary but try not to get hung up on it.