Multiverse hypotheses a real thing that top scientists genuinely

Narwhals aren't real dipshit. No such thing as a fucking sea unicorn.

>>8720539
https://youtu.be/IcxptIJS7kQ?t=24m40s

File: tumblr_nvgml7CnMY1uezd0do1_500.png (163KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 500x500px

>>8720591

Does infinity exist?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRWbIoIR04c

>>8720539
multiverse can't exist due to infinite probability in ours.
If everything that can possibly exist, exists in our universe, then what the hell would exist in another?

>>8720769
I thought multiverse theory accounted for different laws of physics and math as well.

>>8720539
Multiverse is not a hypothesis. Multiverse is a fact. We cannot contact other universes directly, but we can do it by love. Because love is the only thing in this universe, that is not limited by the laws of our Cosmos.

>>8720769
Our universe is finite, not infinite. A multiverse would have everything that could possibly exist, our universe doesn't

Well, its either a inflationary multiverse or we are in a simulated reality.

Inflaton type does seem very likely though, which then up the chance of at least one if the universes running a universe simulation.

File: inflation_multiverse.jpg (28KB, 736x414px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 736x414px

Multiverse within Inflaton field.

>>8720901
What's to say there aren't level 'n' multiverses?

I can't bring myself to care about multiverse since there's no way to measure their existence

>>8720904
still fits in an inflationary theory of multiverses, but I contest there are many potential multiverses, quilted, inflationary, cyclic, quantum, holographic...
but hey it is interesting.

>>8720539
The only reason a multiverse idea is gaining traction is that it's becoming more clear our universe was designed by God. Scientists don't like to admit that fact so they hide behind the idea that maybe there are more universes, so that we could maintain the idea our universe is purely naturalistic.

>>8720922
... and we have the burnt toast to prove it

>>8720539
>Multiverse hypotheses a real thing that top scientists genuinely believe?

No.