Should we ban autistic child prodigies from building AI's?

>>8715320
We should ban you from ever breeding and polluting the gene pool.

>>8715320
too late I already made one
:^)

>>8715320
AI can be something as simple as a video game NPC. I assume you mean a general or learning AI, in which case, someone is going to make one, and there probably won't be more than one. That, or sooner or later one of them will destroy us all.

>>8715320
>Should we ban autistic child prodigies from building AI's?
>Should we ban people who were edgy teens from learning how to make AI's?

>implying it's possible to ban technology

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMptVkyZWE4

>>8715320
Why would anyone do that? Why would you even consider it?

File: 1472172980625.jpg (8KB, 248x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 248x250px

>>8715763
Autistic people might make an autistic AI

sadistic edgy people might make a sadistic edgy AI

>>8715512
>sooner or later one of them will destroy us all.
Why do people keep believing this meme?

>>8715512
>they would destroy us all

Why would they do this? There's nothing in it for them to destroy whoever created them and keeps improving them.

However, I could see them coming to the conclusion that people who don't contribute in terms of
- intelligence, inventing
- economics
- biodiversity (too many humans of sub-par quality)

Should be eradicated, because they wouldn't hold the same irrational emotional boundary as we do, placing humans above all, even the humans that are clearly less useful than the common worm