>there are actually brainlets on this board that believe aging

Honestly, the Christian God makes more sense than most "researchable" sciences.

>>8714468
>So you're just picking and choosing now?
Don't all of us have only "opinions"?
Rather arrogant of anyone to deny any god rather than merely doubt it, based on their experiences. Especially when their god mostly screws people who are disbelievers: But they don't say anything about doubters. Besides, they sing of their wretchedness, so how bad can a doubter be?

File: image.jpg (16KB, 251x201px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 251x201px

>>8714468
>he believes that current ageing is the slowest rate of entrophy possible
>he can't comprehend that while entrophy will always occur, it can potentially occur slowly enough that a human will outlive a sun
>he can't comprehend that with biological replication of human organs entrophy can be reversed by substitution

Where is your data for these claims that we can't achieve functional immortality?

>>8714689
Because he feeeeels it maaaan...

>>8714473
>Honestly, the Christian God makes more sense than most "researchable" sciences.

that's because you're to uneducated to understand it.

>>8714468
>there are people on this board that dismiss the idea of god but believe in immortality

you're an idiot

>>8714823
*too understand
and you called me stupid

File: grammar_nazi.jpg (31KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 600x450px

>>8714826

>>8714826
*too uneducated to understand
Yes he did

>>8714468
> my body is a closed system
So you're telling me that if I don't eat, I'll die? Whoa...

>>8714473
You do realise that if a God existed, He would necessarily be mortal due to the aforementioned laws of thermodynamics?

Thus, how does an immortal being who completely flouts all the laws of physics make any more sense than empirical, reproducible data derived from stringent research?

File: debate.jpg (74KB, 400x565px)

74KB, 400x565px

>>8714826

>>8714954
cuck

>>8714832
>>8714846
>>8714954
ez

>>8714468
>not realising this violates the 2ND law of thermodynamics.
Goddamnit is sci full of bait posts now.

it doesn't violate the 2nd law because we're not a closed system. stop trying to sound smarter than you are and go learn something.

>>8714468
No one is seriously considering forms of immortality the transcend the heat death of the universe. Beating aging is entirely plausible by most metrics, even if cancer always waits in the wings or brains ultimately fail to function. Immortality isn't the same as never dying, it just means we discard the hard time limit and physical decay we've labored under.

File: 1473792820457.jpg (54KB, 566x480px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 566x480px

>>8714689
>entrophy can be reversed by substitution

File: 1459959884994.gif (1MB, 580x433px)

1MB, 580x433px

>>8715680
>we're not a closed system

File: image.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

>>8715789
>parts in a machine suffer entrophy due to heat, mechanical wear, etc
>"hurr durr, changing them out for a new part doesn't reset changes caused by entrophy"

You wut?