Number of times a sheet of paper can be folded = infinite Number

should we call them manyfolds?

>>8691313
It's structural limitations wouldn't allow you to fold it into all the infinite shapes in the universe.

File: origami.gif (88KB, 600x848px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 600x848px

>>8691617
Well, not all at once, no.

Dumbass, you can't fold anything because atoms don't want to be near eachother.

>>8691632
If atoms are anything like my tsundere anime characters then all it takes to loosen up and get along with each other is a little affection.

>>8691313
>Number of times a sheet of paper can be folded = infinite

Actually it's 7. Doesn't matter how thin you make the paper,either, 7 is the maximum.

>>8691640
The coulomb barrier is not "little", my dude. You can't overcome it unless you lift.

File: paper folded fan.jpg (19KB, 350x260px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 350x260px

>>8691659
I refute you thus.

>>8691689
Do you know what Jake's gramps did with smartasses like you back in MIT

>>8691617
>>8691626
No, there are countless examples of shapes that can't be formed through paper folding. The simplest one is a sphere

>>8691317
fpbp

>>8691313
No matter how you fold it, paper still has 0 curvature and thus cannot form a shape with non-zero curvature.

>>8691313
>Number of times a sheet of paper can be folded = infinite
There is absolutely no reason why that would be the case.

Even stacking individual the individual atoms of a sheet of paper on top of echother will only give a finite stack.