If consciousness is based on quantum phenomenon in a non-local

How about fuck Deepak Chopra and his nonsense

>>8691273
>Everything I can't comprehend is nonsense

>does that mean we emit sub-atomic particles every time we think?

It's certainly a possible explanation for the observer effect in the double slit experiment. A particle from your mind probably influences the result.

>>8691278

Everything Deepak Chopra says is nonsense.

>>8691336
Must be nice living in your bubble of ignorance.

If bullshit then bullshit? Yes.

>>8691266
wow?
How do you make foreign thoughts invade minds?

>>8691518
This reality is a virtual machine inside the OS that is God

Most "scientific" explanations of the double slits experiment are evasive BS.

>imagine you are in a lift/escalator that takes you to a random floor
>but only takes you to odd floors if you step out and look which floor it is
>blah blah superposition collapses blah blah probability quantum field blah blah
>SCIENCE and totally not absurd because I use a lot of seemingly scientific jargons even though they make no sense.

"How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't"

>>8691998
Everything admits light particles. When measuring single particles of light, the light coming from the device you are using to measure interacts with the light particles you are trying to measure. This makes it impossible to measure single particles without somehow interacting with then.

>>8691266
Deepak Chopra knows as much of physics as I know of the Maori language.

I know it exists, but the best thing i can go is make some nonsensical noises with my mouth.

POO

File: 1464730661511.png (483KB, 1300x866px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1300x866px

>>8691308
>tfw too intelligent to test for particles emitted from the observer

File: alphago.jpg (242KB, 1400x788px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1400x788px

>>8695109
kek

>>8691266
>If consciousness is based on quantum phenomenon
It's not

>>8695801
But the double slit expirment.. and Dr Quantum/What the Bleep

>>8695807
lel