>"Dostoevsky gives me more than any scientist, more than

>>8680187
ugly semite

it's only stupid because you haven't read dostoevsky

why do brainlets on /sci/ take pride in being illiterate?

File: nabokov_boxing_gloves-530x317.jpg (32KB, 530x317px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 530x317px

>>8680193
>>8680187
Dostoevsky isn't even patrician. Literally the edgy teen's tolstoy. Thinking of dostoevsky as an intellectual is one of the most common hallmarks of a pseud.

>>8680192

Back where you came from.

>>>/pol/catalog

>>8680200
shitting on obvious lit giants is also being pseud and edgy
>I think different than the others so im smart
cmon

>>8680187
This, he should mention Proust instead.

>>8680187
Einstein was a brainlet

Can I get a quick rundown on Dostoevsky?

>>8680187
>Why would he say something so stupid?
Because he was an attention whore.
Even brainlets know that there's no truth outside math.

>>8680187

There's more to life than just science.

>>8680334
Einstein bows to him

File: 200px-Erdos_head_budapest_fall_1992.jpg (18KB, 200x226px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 200x226px

>>8680364
>There's more to life than just science.
Brainlet.

>>8680200
>comparing them because they're Russian
get out you poser
>>8680187
i doubt he spent all his time reading

File: harold-bloom.jpg (330KB, 1600x1050px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1600x1050px

>>8680256
>>8680409
>claim to be /lit/ but have never read Nabakov's btfoing of Dosto

>>8680440
Nabakov btfo of literally everybody but himself
He was a good writer but his opinions are entirely out of smugness

>>8680187
Because science will never solve the mysteries of the universe. It will only measure them and then act cocky and like a shit head because of muh measurements.

>>8680279
Elaborate plz. Aspiring /lit