How much energy would you need to put into Mars' core to liquefy it? Or rather, *how many* nuclear arsenals would liquefy it?
Short answer: 7
Long answer: 7.000000000000
42
>>8671603
More than it currently has.
Less than the Sun
>>8671603
Why would you want a liquid core? Geologically dead worlds have a big advantage in stability.
>>8671603
Too much
>>8671655
this
>>8671603
Far less energy than it would take to cover the entire surface with domes.
>>8671603
Your question lacks specifics in which to base any sensible answer.
I can't see a way that nuclear explosions could be contained to possibly work.
If you want an reasonable answer: a LOT of 9 volt batteries.
>>8671914
Bullshit.
>>8671914
I think you spelled"more" incorrectly.