Who has more money and higher standart of living? A thirld worlder

>More money
Obviously the first worlder
>Higher standard of living
Depends on the things you value. You an afford more for your money in the third world but you'll be surrounded by uneducated people you can pay $5 to suck your dick. In the first world 80k won't go as far but still gets you a nice house and family along with a non-crumbling infrastructure.

The latter.

>>8667564
>he thinks latinoamerica, india and asia are failling states
not diferent than living in some poor area in the US.
argentina, uruguay and chile are still nice.

or eastern europe.

a 40k job in latinoamerica will put you in the top 1% of jobs.

so, you failed the question.

how much money does being in the top 1% of jobs in europe has to make?

>>8667564
>>8667538

It depends on the GDP and poverty line of either country.

>>8667571
not really, wrong.

$40k in the third world goes way way further than $80k does in the first world in fact I'd say in some parts of the first world $80k is just barely middle class.

>>8667593
40k in the thirld world already put you in the top 1%

>>8667564
>He doesn't Know what purchasing power is.

>>8667538

THIS REALLY DEPENDS ON THE PRICE OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN THE COUNTRY DOESN'T IT NOW

>>8667576
3rd world would have worse infrastructure, crime, federal systems, medical care, ISPs, culture, etc.

>>8667633
>he thinks all thirld world nations are failing states
kek

>>8667635
Name one that is 3rd world and isn't shitty.

>>8667648
uruguay

>>8667648
Sweden.

>>8667538
Money is relative based on what one can buy with x dollars. Standard of living is based on one's greed and lust; or on reasonable needs. There are far too many factors to say even if you specified country. Being content at 40k is better than being miserably insecure and inadequate at 80k because all your co-workers make more.

>>8667538
Given the AND in your question the only possible answer is the first worlder, as the third worlder cannot have a higher standard of living AND make more money out of the two.

Depending on the cost of goods of services for the third worlder, the answer may very well be "neither."

>>8667715
not really.
40k in the thirld world put you in the top 1% income earners in that country.

>>8667538
40K in a first world country isn't that bad.

>>8667719
doesn't matter. 40k<80k.

>>8667743
cost of living retard.

>>8667745
Irrelevant because 40k is less than 80k.

>>8667538
holy shit, 40k a year is a really good income here in brazil, it's ~120000 reals a year, 10000 per month

minimum wage here is less than 1000 reals a month

that can get you a good living standard here

>>8667816
not really.

imagine if with 40k you could buy a BMW in brazil while 80k you could buy a bike in USA.

remember that you don't eat or live with the money, money is to get stuff.

get more stuff = more money.

the number is not important, otherwise a zimbawe billion bill would be real.

dumb retard can't into basics of economics.

>>8667538
>higher standart of living
>40k per year or a first world
this one

>has more money
>80k per year
this one

The latter has a higher standard of living (unless he has 5 kids or something). It's actually pretty hard to improve your quality of life in a third world country with extra money:

-Lots of things simply aren't available or have to be imported. That food you like? Nope, not there.
-Having lots of money doesn't make the local stores, restaurants, or public institutions any nicer.
-You also have to worry about people stealing your shit more, so better hire some guards (which costs money).
-You can have a nice house, as long as you pay for people to build it (made with local materials, local tools, and local work -- good luck with that).

All told you have be making a LOT before living in a third world country is attractive in terms of quality of life.

>>8667538
Actually 99.9℅ of anons don't answer this dumbfuck.

In my country you could live with 6k

>>8667652
>>8667682
Third world nations now mean shithole countries, not countries that we're neutral during the cold war.