>*book title* ... for Engineers Who's also sick and

File: IMG_1173.png (404KB, 729x685px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 729x685px

Which book did you pick up?

I have a bookshelf full of books in engineering that doesn't say "for engineers."

I can't imagine a title like "Introductory solid mechanics for engineers"
Or steel design.... for engineers

Is this like a "for dummies" version for contractor posers and high schoolers?

>Chemical Engineering fundamentals for Engineers
Wow.

>>8656956
Here's some shit that plagues all of research and academia:
>"HURR and DURR and I'm a witty fuck"
>colon
>"the actual subject of this article"

As fun as these authors think they are, article titles that don't explicitly state the topic discussed make lit review a shitty experience.

>>8656995
Examples?

>>8657024
Not him but there are a few books that aren't used in academia that are more supportive material written by independent authors.

I think I have a book somewhere that's called calculus for cats : calculus concepts in real life applications or something along those lines.

This does coincide with OP in that it's for brainlets like myself whom needed additional reference material to understand and conceptualize.

But I have 0 textbooks that have an "X Y for X" title

File: 1475899639831.jpg (68KB, 699x485px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 699x485px

>>8656956
>War and Peace for Engineers

File: after a long day at work you can undo your human costume and nobody's the wiser.jpg (29KB, 329x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 329x500px

>engineering for engineers

File: IMG_1171.jpg (30KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x400px

>semester starting
>buy textbooks for class

>US history for Mechanical Engineers
>Folklore for Mechanicals engineers
>Thermodynamics for buisiness management
>calculus II for Music theory
>anatomy and physiology of the human body for computer scientists

>>8657050
>use 'whom' to sound smart
>use it incorrectly

You're the kind of person these "...for engineers" books are written for.

How to be a sissy cock slave for engineers (males)

>>8657135

can you fucking read? He already said he needs them. God this board is full of faggots like you who think they are geniuses but probably couldnt talk to a girl to save their life. Please get off your ass you smelly loser and get a life.

I've been assigned "C for scientists and engineers" and it's fine.

>>8656956
wait till you see the ''....for economists'' books