>>8650536
CFD is just a small and limited subset or mathematics, quantum """""physics""""" is way more interesting

>>8651021
Category Field Theory?

>>8650536
"Brain waves"

>>8650536
What should I call e^x

>identity """""""function"""""""

Matrices are a useful notation

>>8651043
Exponential morphisms

>>8651043
The antilogarithm.

File: 1473654197680.jpg (118KB, 900x641px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 900x641px

>>8650536
>shit brainlets do
Post frogs

>>8651081
>"We can quickly see how complex numbers can be written in three forms: algebraic, trigonometric and antilogarithmic"
>"The solutions to Differential equations can be written as the product of an arbitrary constant and the antilogarithm"

>>8651081
>>8651086
sounds awful and autistic, OP is an undergrad/highschooler

>>8651089
I think the guy who proposed "antilogarithm" was joking, but that doesn't render you statements about OP any less true

>>8650536
what do you call then [math]\textrm{exp}:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} , x \mapsto b^x, \textrm{with } b>0[/math]

>>8651156
Some incomprehensible shit nobody would have any reason to post on a chink wood-carving forum

Post on /sci/

>>8651163
>a function called exp, that maps from the reals to the reals, taking x, and returning b to the x, where b is over 0
brainlet

Post on /sci/

>>8650536
the "exponential" is a function.

>>8652415
It's a distribution you fucking brainlet. It corresponds to a metric space whose measure is concentrated on 0.

>>8651156
>>8651163
>>8651460
[math]f(x)=b^x,b>0,x\in\mathbb{R}[/math]

>>8652438
suck my dick you faggot, it has exponential growth.

>>8652596
kek undergrad detected. get back to me when you take real analysis, kiddo

>>8650536
>>8651021
>>8651023
>>8651039
>>8651043
>>8651069
>>8651073
>>8651079
>>8651081
>>8651085
>>8651086
>>8651089
>>8651110
>>8651156
>>8651163
>>8651177
>>8651460
>>8651467
>>8652415
>>8652438
>>8652443
>>8652596
>>8652609

Hi, it seems you are assuming using "e" is logically sound. Unfortunately, "e" is so called ""real"" and I'm afraid if we're to talk about this objectively we'll have to redefine this in terms of the rationals.

>>8652609
Lol you didn't take real analysis as an undergraduate? What kind of shitty school did you go to?