Does anyone else feel that the entirety of science (and mathematics)

>>8638972
>I think I must just be literally to smart to study science
Okay, Einstein. Give me a good analogy for electromagnetic waves' correlation with the speed of light.

File: aTVSO3s.png (103KB, 624x434px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 624x434px

Sure. If science is soooo easy, then why do all the really smart scientists have cool beards? Darwin, Mendelev, uhhh.... Darwin again...

Are you calling beards trivial? They're obviously a sign of intelligence/superiority. And if all the genieouses like science, how is science in itself not a geniius?

Checkmate, jealous brainlett.

>>8639025
Nice. You really got me there.

Also, let's not forget that the "greatness" of the ancient Greeks is merely a meme passed down through the ages. Nobody even gave a shit about them until the Renaissance, and as we all know, the people back then were gullible dumbasses. Intellectuals today only worship the supposed ancient thinkers to feel better about themselves and validate their autistic pursuits. The same applies to all of the "great" scientists.

>>8639004
Electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light because electromagnetic waves are light waves. The electromagnetic wave can be described by a wave equation whose phase velocity is a fixed constant (which we get by taking the inverse of the square root of two other physical constants multiplied together), and that constant is the speed of light.

>>8639036
>Nobody even gave a shit about them until the Renaissance
retard spotted

You're in the edgy nihilist phase, where you think that everything is pointless, people are horrible and hypocritical which is why they worship the "ancients". You'll snap out of it eventually and realise the profound effect that insignificant ancient memes like Plato, Aristotle, Archimedes, Democritus and Pythagoras had on the progress of mankind. There's a reason whole boards like /sci/, /lit/ and /his/ worship them, and it's not because they're all sheeple who have never seen the utter blackness of existence like you have.

>>8639090
>whole boards
You say that as if there are more than 20 people who post on those boards.

>>8639095
http://www.strawpoll.me/11978410/r

It's a poll inquiring after anons' majors a month ago, thread went on for a few days. 638 posters. And /sci/ is the lowest traffic board out of the three I mentioned in my post.

>>8638972

Do you know how many people say this on /sci/?

You would think there would be more intelligent people in real life if everything was so easy.

>>8638972
>The production of computers, plastics, pharmaceuticals and AI can be achieved with a superficial understanding gleaned via a pop-sci analogy

File: xd.jpg (10KB, 235x194px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 235x194px

>>8638972
>nothing is meaningful or useful unless it's really hard to explain

wat

>>8638972
if your soo smart then prove p = np. faggot

>tfw too smart to not be a brainlet

No. It just sounds like you're depressed. Having trouble sleeping/waking up?

File: Memefication theory.png (222KB, 569x2271px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 569x2271px

>>8638972
Would you argue with kek?

>>8640106

See

>>8640131

>>8638972
>literally to smart
>to smart
>to
I've got good news and bad news, Anon.
You're retarded.
On the bright side, there is room to learn.

>>8638972
Cool, you may be able to answer this for me:

Is every even integer greater than 2 expressable as the sum of two primes?

I need the answer by tomorrow, and with a proper mathematical proof of it.

>>8639066
Now give your answer with evidence and references.

File: demiurge.jpg (125KB, 418x627px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 418x627px

They are.