Is multiverse theory really the end of science? http://cosm

>>8624430
>multiverse

>>>/x/

>>8624430
It isn't even an actual theory man. It's more or less a vague concept.

>>8624438
I don't know. It seems that the world of physics is having an existential crisis over it all the same.

>Although we cannot possibly keep track of the motion of all the individual molecules, we can make extremely precise predictions for how the gas as a whole will behave. Our job is to develop a similar statistical understanding of events in the multiverse.

>>8624438
it's unfalsifiable and therefore not a theory.

>>8624460
>not a theory
>not an argument
You guys are sounding more and more like creationists or /pol/tards

>>8624430
You people really need to start thinking.

What is light?
What is gravity?
What is a field?

Since we cannot answer these questions, we cannot go further.

>>8624466
You know people roam boards, yes?

>>8624472
These are all well defined phenomena. The problem is not what they are but how they are as whether or not we can reduce them into a seamless theory.

>In the multiverse, the volume of space grows indefinitely, all the while producing expanding bubbles with a variety of states inside.

>>8624430
nah this is just a stupid article

trached

>>8624547
Why do I come here?

File: 000.jpg (4MB, 7121x6783px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7121x6783px

Science is already pointless and futile. As the name suggests, science is the search for complete omniscience. Which is simply impossible given the size of the universe.