Why do school shave so many subjects, some of them really obscure,

>>8621161

They have a very small mandatory class like this.

I don't know. I think is missing a lot of very practical and useful classes.

I suppose school is not for learning practical things. Maybe the idea is that your family is supposed to teach you those things?

>>8621161
You mean high schools? Who knows. If you mean college, you can take an economics class but that is completely up to you.

Also, if your teacher somehow fucks up teaching you basic tax filing, I'm sure someone would try to sue.

>>8621161
Because common core is based on the prussian communistic education model, its better for the government have youths with no financial ability so they ultimatly apply for government assistance and side with the government on matters that involve stripping freedoms away from the people as long as it make big daddy government happy.

>>8621161
Economy is pretty useless seeing how it's mostly needed for ordinary folk to run small business and reading up on it requires only basic literacy.

Economy is also not a science.

my school had a ranking of 2/10 on greatschools and even it had Economics AP and also a financial education class that was mandatory. I'm pretty sure the state is in charge of this

File: sci math.png (119KB, 1216x970px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1216x970px

>>8621161
Because everyone is all for removing useless and old subjects but the moment you try to add material, everyone screams bloody murder.

Not sure what you're talking about, OP. I took economy as a very standard elective in high school.