Hi /sci/, My sister just called me a homophobe. How can I explain

you could base your arguments on this genius research

http://io9.gizmodo.com/nigerian-grad-student-uses-magnets-to-prove-gay-marri-1326215449

>>8619259
I do believe the best way will be to shut your mouth and never ever use an analogy between scientific theories and everyday world to give some kind of fake authority to your arguments.

>>8619303
both of your lips are the same thing, repulsion of like electromagnetic fields dictate that they should not be closed.

>>8619259
>fields such as electricity and magnetism
You mean the single field of electromagnetism.

>>8619328
both of your minds are the same thing, repulsion of like electromagnetic fields dictate that they should not be closed.

>>8619259
Protons stay closer to other protons rather than electrons

>>8619328
both of your legs are the same thing, repulsion of like electromagnetic fields dictate that they should not be closed.

File: posss.png (346KB, 1829x788px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1829x788px

>>8619259

>>8619450
>"positivists" apply scientific aphorisms beyond and outside their proper scope
Yeah sure kid
Funny how it's only the anti-science woo crowd that actually does that. Really fries the eggs

>>8619259
Don't give her a superficial analogy you fucking fedorafag. Protons can't help but repel each other, but men can easily fuck each.

I dislike the lgbt movement like any other /pol/ack but using this sort of analogy will only make you look ridiculous

File: haircut-300x300[1].jpg (13KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x300px

>>8619481
Homosexuality is a quintessentially Western institution, anon. No other culture has sufficiently developed as to tolerate it. We must defend it against the foreign hordes!

>>8620086
Checkmate /pol/

>>8619259
>How can I explain
...by not using the nonce-word "evidenced".

>>8619259
To answer your question, it depends on what she studies/has studied.

Also, if there are currents that are flow along two parallel wires, in the same direction, they attract each other, even though they're exactly the same.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/wirfor.html

>>8620180
This is interesting

>>8620086
>quintessentially Western
That's a strange way of spelling "Jewish"

File: gays destroyed...jpg (267KB, 1238x1219px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1238x1219px

last image for this dump. i hope things work out for you op!

>>8620414
That pic could really use a source. I'm not implying it's fake.

>>8620423
>>8620420
>>8620417
>>8620414
FYI, no one takes the time to read /pol/esmokers propaganda that took zero effort to post.

>>8620086
Plainly wrong. There are many ancient and modern cultures out there that contain different genders and identity norms. This belief that is a strange new thing is weirdly lazy in the information age.

I conclude that you're not posting that claim to have any sort of meaningful discussion but rather to confuse and derail other conversation. Unfortunately for you /sci/ is a slow board where threads can last days or weeks.

>>8619303
>I do believe the best way will be to shut your mouth and never ever use an analogy between scientific theories and everyday world to give some kind of fake authority to your arguments.
I'm sure he's being completely serious and not just making fun of a poorly-thought-out term.

>>8620414
>nuh-uh, my degeneracy and shitty life choices are my parents' fault, not my own
>IT'S RAPE BECAUSE I REGRETTED IT

>>8620536
>Plainly wrong. There are many ancient and modern cultures out there that contain different genders and identity norms. This belief that is a strange new thing is weirdly lazy in the information age.
>I conclude that you're not posting that claim to have any sort of meaningful discussion but rather to confuse and derail other conversation. Unfortunately for you /sci/ is a slow board where threads can last days or weeks.
Jesus Christ, this much autism
It's called "working within the internal logic of your opponent." This isn't a sincere belief I sincerely have, and I'm not obligated to defend it as such. And I think Dick Spencer did actually make this argument at one point or another.
Get your head in the fucking game, Anon.

>>8620574
>I was only pretending to be retarded!
Top zoz

>>8620587
You're still missing the point, fucktard.
>"Assume there are finitely many prime numbers. Then we can construct a new number defined as the product of all primes plus one, which is nonprime by hypothesis. But it lacks a prime factorization, contradicting the fundamental theorem of arithmetic."
>Oh aye so yer pretending to be retarded for shits and giggles aye?
kys yourself