Why there's 5000 patents that are forbidden and their inventors

>>8616845
>you have to go back
>>>/x/

Before you go back to >>>/x/, can you tell me what you mean?

>>8616993
https://www.google.com.co/amp/s/www.wired.com/2013/04/gov-secrecy-orders-on-patents/amp/

>>8617554
If you have that article then why do you ask "Why?" you retard? It's right there in the fucking article.

First, because the government can. Second because the government thought it would be unsafe. That is all. No aliens, no reptilians, no nothing. Go back to /x/,
goy.

>>8617557
Why the gov want to ban new technology?

>>8617560
I don't know. Read the article. I mean, it is all there. Literally all there.

>>8617563
What if there's revolutionary shit banned?

File: 1483192078969.gif (2MB, 514x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 514x205px

>>8617554
>https://www.google.com.co/amp/s/www.wired.com/2013/04/gov-secrecy-orders-on-patents/amp/

FFS here's an archive link so no one has to disable their ad blocker

https://archive.fo/H140C

>>8618725
Use uBlock Origin.
It bypasses everything under the sun.

>>8616845
Because we'd need a globalist's NWO and a Orwellian wet dream to keep our world dominance if we didn't.

>>8616845
>inventors put in jail under security reasons
Is this speculation or is there a story you can link us to?

>>8617554
A lot of this sounds like potentially terrible crony capitalism.

>>8616845
Capitalism at work.

The human races is pretty shit honestly. The patent could be potentially deadly and the scientist knows this, but people would re-create it and would use it for their own reasons.