if you could PERFECTLY put your consciousness in a robot/computer, wouldn't you be basically controlling it?
because you would have the exact same thoughts at the exact same time, since free will doesn't real.
or wud it control u
>>8613709
please serious replies only.
>>8613707
if free will doesn't real, then there is no YOU, pathetic brainlet, without free will, there is no reason to priveledge "your" specific collection of muscle and brain tissue organised in such a way, you have as much identity as a piece of dog shit that in fact you invariably hold as much value as
>>8613790
dog shit doesn't pay taxes, dog shit doesn't call the police when you stomp on it.
>>8613707
> wouldn't you be basically controlling it?
by what connection? air? ego?
>>8613707
well regardless of weather or not I am in some kind of "sync" with the robot, I still would not feel what the robot is feeling. From my perspective, that robot is not me. Since identity is entirely subjective, that robot is not me. Therefore I'm still fucked and going to die.