mfw my brother goes out of his way to buy boxed water that has

lol your brother is an idiot

I keep telling him it's the dosage that determines if it's gonna be toxic or not but he doesn't really listen to reason.
Anyone got any arguments or rebuttals to "fluoride is poison"

>>8593290
He sounds pretty unobservant, but it's true that fluoride ingestion is neither safe nor necessary. There is substantial evidence of possible cumulative health risks, especially for neurological development. It's pretty shocking to me how readily everyone dismisses this. I myself assumed that it was just a crackpot conspiracy theory until I evaluated some research. Plus, most people get cavities between their teeth, which can largely be prevented by flossing.

http://www.nap.edu/read/2204/

http://www.nap.edu/read/11571/

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/fluoride-childrens-health-grandjean-choi/

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/a-call-for-reducing-fluoride-levels-in-drinking-water/

http://www.newsweek.com/water-fluoridation-linked-higher-adhd-rates-312748

File: overwatch.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>8593361

a lot of so-called "conspiracy bullshit" is actually based in fact.

fluoride is one of them, thimerosal causing motor tics (which are associated with autism) is another.

Not confronting these facts just makes the actually stupid conspiracy crap have more legitimacy.

>>8593321
google how much fluoride is dangerous, and then google how much fluoride is in tap water. Fluoride is good for your teeth, so google that too.

>>8593371
How right you are. The conspiracy theorists are too busy crying "muh illuminati" to actually investigate their claims scientifically, and as a result the rest of us just assume it's all bullshit. It's much more likely that water fluoridation was just a shamefully egregious error, rather than an intentional conspiracy, only now it's too late to admit the mistake.

>>8593321
>>8593375
What makes you so confident that there's a clearly discernible cutoff for long-term cumulative toxicity? Do you really trust the EPA and the CDC so much that you don't even question their methods and reasoning?

>>8593402
Dunno, it's just something I've heard, could be completely wrong, go sperg somewhere else

>>8593290
>boxed water
Does your country's flag have a leaf on it?

>>8593907
kek

>>8593907
Oh man.

>>8593907
10/10

>>8593290
fluoride is supposed to have something like 7 ppm or ppb or 0.7 idk something with 7 and my water only has 6 or 0.6

so it's utterly useless for its supposed purpose which makes me consider /x/'s theories a bit more and it's some magic byproduct