https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monte _Carlo_integration why

>>8590789
I take the bait, whatever.

You obviously don't use it for two dimensional integration. You can show that Monte Carlo integration converges faster than gridded approaches for higher dimensional integrals (I think >3). You have those a lot, i.e. particles going through a detector where the integration is over the phase space of multiple particles, so you have easily dozens of dimensions if not hundreds and more. Often it's hard to even write it down as an integral at all, as we are usually not talking about integrating some simple function, but rather complex physical systems that you have to model. Calling these calculations "Monte Carlo integration" is a little misleading, the point of those calculations are really the simulations of very complex physical systems (detector systems etc)

>>8590789
Why do you get butthurt about things that don't impact you in any way?

>>8590789
fpbp, /thread

>>8590789
>why retards and ""engineers"" like abuse (overuse ?) it so much to calculate trivial shit
They don't - they use it to approximate shit that ISN'T trivial.

>>8590789
You just started a thread where you demonstrate in the OP that you're insanely stupid compared to engineers.

t. engineer