Why wouldn't this work? >Get asteroid >Coat it in

>>8588253
what material

>>8588253
Would hit dielectric breakdown before a black hole formed.

>>8588270
Really black paint.

>>8588314
im not talking black hole as in singularity im talking black hole as in light is trapped in it

It would most likely work; just wouldn't be a black hole.

>>8588466
>>8588315
>>8588253
This is the dumbest thread in all possible realities.

>>8588578
>1817
>Flying is a dumb idea

>>8590079
If you have a light bulb in a small black box, can light escape?
Does this make it a black hole?
Does it demonstrate anything new to science?
Answer in one word or less, or alternatively never post again

>>8588315

That wouldn't "slow the speed of light", just change the amount of light reflected. The light that is absorbed will just used to keep electrons in a different energy state.

>>8590694
Why the quotation marks? Never heard of index of refraction?

>>8590719

Refraction doesn't slow the speed of light you goon, it just changes its direction.

>>8588315
It would work, you would just need a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT of fucking black paint.

About 3 solar masses worth.

>>8590723
Do yourself a favor and look it up.

>>8590785

No, you do youself a favour. The speed of light does not change. The time it takes for it travel through n, where n=material changes, but not the actual physical constant. If it did change, then it would violate special relativity.

>>8590799
>in a vacuum

File: wrong.png (15KB, 839x537px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 839x537px

>>8590799
This.

The light in the material still moves at the same speed it just that it takes a longer path through the material due to bouncing around inside the material more ergo moving a further path distance.

The speed of light is constant. It is always constant.

>>8591191
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiHN0ZWE5bk

>>8588253
>Get asteroid
How? You can't create one on a 3D printer.

Escape velocity is derived from the gravitational pull that the asteroid exerts on an object with mass. Light has no mass, therefore it does not get affected by the asteroid's gravity.
Although according to general relativity gravity does cause a certain effect on light, it would be too small to even notice.

Therefore, OP is a faggot.

>>8588253
You mean by covering the asteroid with high-intensity flashlights? That way the light heading towards the asteroid gets hit with the light leaving the asteroid and [redacted] happens

>>8588253
Do you add extra bosons for added gravity?

>>8590783
Hold up, let me call you're mother.