If a black hole is a singularity, how can we have large and small black holes? You can't have an infinitely small and massive object that is larger than another infinitely small and massive object
>http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/75619/are-black-holes-really-singularities
has a good explanation. Basically, black holes aren't singularities throughout, but they have a singularity at the center.
>>8574444
Singularities are infinitely dense, not infinitely massive
>>8574542
your infinitely dense
>>8574560
Rood
>>8574444
Checked
>>8574444
Check em
The radius of the event horizon is dependent on the black hole's mass. I can't be arsed to look up the Schwarzchild radius equation, but it describes the relationship quite clearly if you want to learn more.
Interesting fact: The name Schwarzchild is German for "black shield."
>>8574444
>>8574444
Kek confirms that singularities aren't real
>>8574573
>I believe what Hitler says, and ignore what he does
>wtf I love Trump too
>>8574626
He killed jews who are the most greedy disgusting capitalists now. I fail to see your point.
>>8574560
>your
you're
>dense
yeah.
>>8574579
It's an easy one to remember. Take the equation for escape velocity of a planet and set it equal to c. This isn't a proper way of deriving it, but it makes intuitive sense (light can't escape a BH).
The mass isn't fininite; There is only so much that has been absorbed by it
>>8574444
I'd put my singularity in her black hole, if you know what I mean
>>8574444
When a star explodes and forms a black hole by being at or above a critical mass, the event horizon forms at the center, grows outward and breaks through the star's surface just as the star collapses into a singularity.
The size of the black hole is the radius of the event horizon. It depends on how massive the star was which was responsible for the black hole.
Also black holes get bigger the more mass they absorb.
>>8574542
this
you can't squish atoms together, only infinitely decrease the space between them
>>8574444
The singularities might be the same size, but they don't have to have the same mass. A more massive singularity will have a greater gravity well and a bigger event horizon, which makes it look bigger in total.
>>8575045
Heh heh heh kek lol lulz... Umm.. no. Explain it to us, junior.
>literal cosmic irises capable of observation turn that which they observe into "things" or "stuff" and our portraits are only as good as those
wrong question right subject senpai
>>8574444
>You can't have an infinitely small
Singularities are not infinitely small, they have a diameter that is directly proportionate to their total entropy.
>>8576392
What if there's a benis instead :DD
What the FUCK is wrong with that woman's skin?!
>>8578612
Heavily photoshopped freckles
>>8578635
Nah, freckles actually get like that sometimes.
>>8574444
HOLY FRECKLES
>>8575011
Summerboy: The post
>>8575090
>black holes get bigger the more mass they absorb
that's because they are spherical masses with a surface just like any other. The mass doesn't disappear when it is gravitationally pulled past the E.H.