Who is doing the latest work in nanotechnology? The last I r

>>8520296
>Who is doing the latest work in nanotechnology?

AMD.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_%28microarchitecture%29

14 nm architecture.

>>8520296
Also, chemists... <10 angstron architecture.

>>8520296
Chemists. Every fucking day you see some new crazy nano stuff.

Here is an article that is recent
http://m.phys.org/news/2016-12-rotary-molecular-motor-self-assembly-handedness.html

>> 2008
Shit that's old. We had Moriarty's mechanosynthesis work since then

>>8520343
Good luck wiring up stuff at 10 angstroms. Good luck synthesizing a processor and getting decent yields

File: nanotube.jpg (13KB, 293x172px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 293x172px

>>8520351
>Good luck wiring up stuff at 10 angstroms

I don't know, they engineer molecules pretty good.

Nano engineering doesn't always mean "Wires and stuff"

you know, except when it does.

>>8520366
>>8520343
Yes chemists have made single molecule transistors, which would enable angstrom level architectures. However, our synthetic chemistry is not good enough to assemble them into circuits to make a processor.(This is of course assuming said processor wouldn't be killed by parasitic capacitance and what not)

>>carbon nanotubes
with specific uniform sizes are really fucking hard to obtain.